Skip to content

Indicator dashboard

Ten risk indicators, computed on every purchase in SEAP since 2018.

Each indicator looks for a different risk pattern. A flagged case is a statistical anomaly worth checking, not a proven illegality.

Authorities flagged

8,670

47.5% of the 18,238 authorities that spent public money

Flagged by 3 or more indicators

3,953

21.7% of authorities, out of 8 indicators that score them

Suppliers flagged

32,232

14.4% of the 223,776 suppliers paid with public money

Indicators computed

10

on data from 2018–2026

How it is counted

The indicators count different things (a lot, an authority–supplier pair, an authority-year, a market), so this page never adds their cases or money together. It only combines who was flagged.

  1. Eight indicators count for authorities: #01, #02, #04, #06, #07, #08, #09 and #10. #03 concerns the supplier only, and #05 is included through #06, its authority-level form.
  2. An indicator flags an authority when it holds a case for it. #04 is read at its 80% captivity threshold.
  3. #06 and #09 give a score to every authority above a minimum, so here only high scores count: #06 from a single-bidder rate of 50% over at least 5 lots, #09 from a DSI above 60% in some year.
  4. Seven indicators count for suppliers: #01, #02, #03, #04, #07, #10 (when the supplier is the largest in the market) and #05, when at least half of at least 5 lots won drew a single offer.
  5. The authorities that spent public money are those present in any of the three streams: direct purchases, offline purchases and tenders.

A large authority buys more and more often, so it has more occasions to be flagged than a small town hall. The number of indicators helps set priorities; it is not a risk score.

The ten indicators

Each indicator counts in its own unit, so figures on different rows do not add up. The rate is the share of everything that could be flagged that was flagged in the latest complete year.

The ten indicators
Indicator One case is Cases Money at stake Flag rate Trend
High risk #01 Slicing Artificial slicing of direct purchases authority–supplier–CPV–year group 35,864 14,740,258,992 1.3% 2025 Artificial slicing of direct purchases — flag rate by year, % — 2018: 0.9 *; 2019: 1.6; 2020: 1.8; 2021: 2; 2022: 1.4; 2023: 1.2; 2024: 1.4; 2025: 1.3; 2026: 1.1 *
High risk #02 At the ceiling Direct purchases at the legal ceiling direct purchase 45,948 11,893,367,671 22.0% 2025 Direct purchases at the legal ceiling — flag rate by year, % — 2018: 23.9 *; 2019: 24; 2020: 23.1; 2021: 25.5; 2022: 24.9; 2023: 19.4; 2024: 20; 2025: 22; 2026: 22.6 *
High risk #03 New companies New companies winning public money new company 9,165 1,154,135,604 7.2% 2025 New companies winning public money — flag rate by year, % — 2018: 1.1 *; 2019: 3.3; 2020: 3.8; 2021: 5.2; 2022: 5.9; 2023: 6.7; 2024: 6.2; 2025: 7.2; 2026: 7.9 *
Medium risk #04 Captivity Supplier captivity authority–supplier pair 378 46,905,309,071 — —
High risk #05 Single bidder Tender lots with a single bidder tender lot 213,980 271,915,579,083 37.6% 2025 Tender lots with a single bidder — flag rate by year, % — 2018: 46.7 *; 2019: 41.7; 2020: 37.1; 2021: 37.6; 2022: 40.3; 2023: 40.4; 2024: 39.9; 2025: 37.6; 2026: 36.9 *
High risk #06 Single-bidder rate Authority ranking by single-bidder rate ranked authority 5,138 262,008,574,054 — —
High risk #07 Exact price match Price matching the estimate exactly tender lot 19,310 5,496,432,371 9.1% 2025 Price matching the estimate exactly — flag rate by year, % — 2018: 7.5 *; 2019: 7.8; 2020: 7.4; 2021: 8; 2022: 8.3; 2023: 8.2; 2024: 8.6; 2025: 9.1; 2026: 10.2 *
Medium risk #08 Year-end Year-end spending authority-year 3,152 1,056,851,458 4.0% 2025 Year-end spending — flag rate by year, % — 2018: 4.3 *; 2019: 4.6; 2020: 5.3; 2021: 4.5; 2022: 4.9; 2023: 4.1; 2024: 4; 2025: 4
Medium risk #09 DSI index Discretionary spend index authority 4,323 109,788,619,060 24.2% 2025 Discretionary spend index — flag rate by year, % — 2018: 18.3 *; 2019: 11.4; 2020: 17.1; 2021: 23.4; 2022: 30.6; 2023: 21; 2024: 21.7; 2025: 24.2; 2026: 26 *
Medium risk #10 Concentration Supplier concentration (HHI) market: authority–CPV 649 51,279,750,745 13.5% 2025 Supplier concentration (HHI) — flag rate by year, % — 2018: 14.4 *; 2019: 16.4; 2020: 16; 2021: 14.2; 2022: 13.1; 2023: 12.7; 2024: 13.9; 2025: 13.5; 2026: 12.8 *

"Money at stake" does not mean the same thing for every indicator: for #08 it is the December excess, for #09 the discretionary spend, and #06 counts #05's money only at the authorities it ranks (at least 5 lots), 9,907,005,029 less.

One case is
What the indicator counts as one case. Figures on different rows are not comparable and do not add up.
Cases
How many cases the indicator holds across all years, as its own page shows them unfiltered.
Money at stake
The money the cases concern, computed by each indicator in its own way.
Flag rate
Cases in the latest complete year divided by everything that could be flagged that year. A dash: the indicator has nothing to compare against.
Trend
The rate by year or, where there is no rate, cases per year. Incomplete years are dashed.

Converging signals

A single indicator can have a mundane explanation. When several flag the same authority or supplier, it deserves a closer look.

How many indicators flag the same entity

Each bar is the share of flagged entities with exactly that many indicators. Suppliers can have at most seven.

Which indicators travel together

Which indicators travel together
Row indicator #01 #02 #04 #06 #07 #08 #09 #10
#01 Slicing 5,656 81 1 27 17 25 38 24
#02 At the ceiling 73 6,303 2 26 16 24 34 21
#04 Captivity 22 26 368 8 8 5 4 10
#06 Single-bidder rate 73 78 1 2,094 29 23 38 27
#07 Exact price match 72 73 2 45 1,358 19 40 52
#08 Year-end 62 65 1 21 11 2,297 26 15
#09 DSI index 94 93 1 34 24 26 2,301 36
#10 Concentration 84 82 2 34 44 22 52 1,619

Read along the row: of the authorities flagged by the indicator on the left, the percentage also flagged by the indicator in the column. The diagonal shows how many authorities each indicator flags.

Authorities flagged by the most indicators

Authorities flagged by the most indicators
Authority Spend Indicators
COMPANIA AQUASERV SA MUREȘ 837,741,188 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
INSTITUTUL DE URGENTA PENTRU BOLI CARDIOVASCULARE SI TRANSPLANT TARGU-MURES MUREȘ 690,190,564 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
SOCIETATEA DE REPARATII LOCOMOTIVE CFR- SCRL BRASOV SA BRAȘOV 343,968,369 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Supplier captivity, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
SPITALUL CLINIC JUDETEAN DE URGENTA TARGU MURES MUREȘ 295,861,599 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
ORASUL DARABANI BOTOȘANI 291,353,947 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
INSTITUTUL NATIONAL PENTRU SANATATEA MAMEI SI COPILULUI ALESSANDRESCU-RUSESCU BUCURESTI BUCUREȘTI 287,799,577 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
ORASUL INTORSURA BUZAULUI COVASNA 243,815,430 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Supplier captivity, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
UM 0521 BUCURESTI BUCUREȘTI 178,469,284 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
DIRECTIA GENERALA DE ASISTENTA SOCIALA SI PROTECTIA COPILULUI BACĂU 134,866,520 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
UNIVERSITATEA AUREL VLAICU ARAD ARAD 117,124,225 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
CLUBUL SPORTIV RAPID-BUCURESTI BUCUREȘTI 105,802,720 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
UNIVERSITATEA NATIONALA DE ARTA TEATRALA SI CINEMATOGRAFICA ION LUCA CARAGIALE DIN BUCURESTI BUCUREȘTI 103,094,448 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
ORASUL VIDELE TELEORMAN 92,039,105 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
AEROPORTUL STEFAN CEL MARE SUCEAVA RA SUCEAVA 83,467,663 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
COMUNA DIMITRIE CANTEMIR GIURGIU 73,920,364 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
COMUNA BISTRET DOLJ 60,363,395 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
INSTITUTUL NATIONAL DE CERCETARE-DEZVOLTARE MARINA GRIGORE ANTIPA-INCDM CONSTANTA CONSTANȚA 30,861,275 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
UNITATEA MILITARA 02512 Z DOLJ 28,112,595 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Supplier captivity, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Supplier concentration (HHI)
ECO - SAL SA SIBIU 28,092,164 7 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Year-end spending, Discretionary spend index, Supplier concentration (HHI)
UNITATEA MILITARA 02550 C BUCURESTI BUCUREȘTI 16,025,510,131 6 of 8 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Supplier captivity, Authority ranking by single-bidder rate, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)

Suppliers flagged by the most indicators

Suppliers flagged by the most indicators
Supplier Revenue Indicators
E-NFORMATION SRL BUCUREȘTI 448,149,105 6 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Supplier captivity, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
UNIVERSITATEA BABES BOLYAI CLUJ 25,067,388 6 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, New companies winning public money, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
DANTE INTERNATIONAL SA BUCUREȘTI 3,667,389,939 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Supplier captivity, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
DELTAMED SRL CLUJ 3,322,752,767 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
OMV PETROM MARKETING SRL BUCUREȘTI 2,457,883,135 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
UTI CONSTRUCTION AND FACILITY MANAGEMENT SA BUCUREȘTI 2,230,838,169 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
LOGIC COMPUTER SRL BUCUREȘTI 1,550,968,520 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
RENAULT COMMERCIAL ROUMANIE SRL BUCUREȘTI 1,183,384,930 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
VESTRA INDUSTRY SRL BOTOȘANI 1,144,619,699 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
IRIDEX GROUP SALUBRIZARE SRL BUCUREȘTI 1,030,420,586 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
SOCIETATEA NATIONALA A SARII SA BUCUREȘTI 1,025,722,544 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
COMPANIA NATIONALA POSTA ROMANA SA BUCUREȘTI 929,390,280 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
GRADINARIU IMPORT EXPORT SRL BUCUREȘTI 887,277,259 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
MAGUAY COMPUTERS SRL BUCUREȘTI 662,395,700 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
BANCA COMERCIALA ROMANA SA BUCUREȘTI 662,004,064 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
CTE SOLUTION - UTILAJE SPECIALIZATE SRL ILFOV 660,873,830 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
COMPANIA NATIONALA UNIFARM SA BUCUREȘTI 632,697,036 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
MEDTRONIC ROMANIA SRL BUCUREȘTI 618,460,238 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
SANTE INTERNATIONAL SA BUCUREȘTI 583,157,084 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)
SIEMENS HEALTHCARE SRL BUCUREȘTI 580,882,721 5 of 7 indicators: Artificial slicing of direct purchases, Direct purchases at the legal ceiling, Tender lots with a single bidder, Price matching the estimate exactly, Supplier concentration (HHI)

Among equals, the order is by money. Each lit symbol leads to that indicator's cases, filtered to the entity.

Over time

One chart per indicator, on its own scale. Where possible the chart shows the rate, so that growth in purchasing does not look like growth in risk.

#01 Slicing

flag rate by year, %

#02 At the ceiling

flag rate by year, %

#03 New companies

flag rate by year, %

#05 Single bidder

flag rate by year, %

#07 Exact price match

flag rate by year, %

#08 Year-end

flag rate by year, %

#09 DSI index

flag rate by year, %

#10 Concentration

flag rate by year, %

Incomplete years are dashed: the data begins in April 2018 and the current year is not over. For #08, 29–31 December 2023 are missing from the data. For #03 the rate is understated in the first years: first public money partly means first seen in the data.

Where it clusters

By county, from the authority's seat, and by CPV division.

Share of authorities flagged, by county

Share of authorities flagged, by county Map of Romania with counties shaded by the share of authorities flagged by at least one indicator; darker means a larger share. ALBA — 45.4% ARAD — 34.8% ARGEȘ — 43.2% BACĂU — 49.4% BIHOR — 50.1% BISTRIȚA-NĂSĂUD — 47.5% BOTOȘANI — 39.8% BRĂILA — 52.0% BRAȘOV — 50.2% BUCUREȘTI — 62.0% BUZĂU — 43.8% CĂLĂRAȘI — 47.1% CARAȘ-SEVERIN — 42.2% CLUJ — 52.1% CONSTANȚA — 47.8% COVASNA — 44.9% DÂMBOVIȚA — 46.0% DOLJ — 51.4% GALAȚI — 41.1% GIURGIU — 46.6% GORJ — 44.9% HARGHITA — 40.5% HUNEDOARA — 49.4% IALOMIȚA — 46.7% IAȘI — 48.6% ILFOV — 52.6% MARAMUREȘ — 46.4% MEHEDINȚI — 44.2% MUREȘ — 44.0% NEAMȚ — 46.0% OLT — 49.4% PRAHOVA — 41.4% SĂLAJ — 42.4% SATU MARE — 42.6% SIBIU — 47.2% SUCEAVA — 44.7% TELEORMAN — 47.3% TIMIȘ — 51.0% TULCEA — 43.6% VÂLCEA — 43.9% VASLUI — 43.0% VRANCEA — 48.5%
Lower share Higher share Boundaries: geoBoundaries

Authorities flagged by at least one indicator, out of every authority in the county that spent public money. Click a county to open its list of authorities.

What the flagged money was spent on

What the flagged money was spent on
CPV division #01 #02 #05 #07 #08 #09 #10
45 LUCRARI DE CONSTRUCTII 36 43 55 7 32 27 50
71 SERVICII DE ARHITECTURA, DE CONSTRUCTII, DE INGINERIE SI DE INSPECTIE 17 21 1 1 9 12 1
33 ECHIPAMENTE MEDICALE, PRODUSE FARMACEUTICE SI PRODUSE DE INGRIJIRE PERSONALA 12 1 6 25 2 7 0
79 SERVICII PENTRU INTREPRINDERI: DREPT, MARKETING, CONSULTANTA, RECRUTARE, TIPARIRE SI SECURITATE 9 10 2 2 10 9 5
34 ECHIPAMENT DE TRANSPORT SI PRODUSE AUXILIARE PENTRU TRANSPORT 1 2 5 12 3 3 4
50 SERVICII DE REPARARE SI INTRETINERE 1 2 5 9 3 4 3
77 SERVICII PENTRU AGRICULTURA, SILVICULTURA, HORTICULTURA, ACVACULTURA SI APICULTURA 1 1 2 4 0 1 8
90 SERVICII DE EVACUARE A APELOR REZIDUALE, DE ELIMINARE A DESEURILOR, DE IGIENIZARE SI SERVICII PRIVIND MEDIUL 2 3 3 2 3 2 3
30 ECHIPAMENT INFORMATIC SI ACCESORII DE BIROU, CU EXCEPTIA MOBILIERULUI SI A PACHETELOR SOFTWARE 2 1 1 1 5 3 3
39 MOBILA (INCLUSIV MOBILA DE BIROU), ACCESORII DE MOBILIER, APARATE DE UZ CASNIC (EXCLUSIV DISPOZITIVE DE ILUMINAT) SI PRODUSE DE CURATAT 2 2 0 1 5 4 0
44 STRUCTURI SI MATERIALE DE CONSTRUCTII; PRODUSE AUXILIARE PENTRU CONSTRUCTII (CU EXCEPTIA APARATELOR ELECTRICE) 3 2 1 1 4 4 0
38 ECHIPAMENTE DE LABORATOR, OPTICE SI DE PRECIZIE (CU EXCEPTIA OCHELARILOR) 0 1 1 8 1 1 2
The other 33 divisions 14 13 17 26 24 23 19

Each column is one indicator and sums to 100%: the part of its flagged money that falls in each division. Divisions are ordered by their mean share, so every indicator weighs the same. #08 counts the December window spend, #09 the discretionary spend. #03, #04 and #06 carry no CPV code.

A flagged case is not an accusation. The thresholds are statistical, and the data is the data published on data.gov.ro. Methodology.

The same data, through the API

Every figure on this page comes from the public API, through the endpoints below. The parameters each one takes are in the documentation; each needs an access key.

  • /api/v1/red-flags/overview
  • /api/v1/red-flags/coverage
  • /api/v1/red-flags/overview/years
  • /api/v1/red-flags/convergence
  • /api/v1/red-flags/cooccurrence
  • /api/v1/red-flags/most-flagged/authorities
  • /api/v1/red-flags/most-flagged/suppliers
  • /api/v1/red-flags/overview/cpv
  • /api/v1/red-flags/by-county

Open data and API