Skip to content

Authorities and suppliers

Who buys, who sells, and how they are linked.

Size

A few hold most of the money

Entities split by their money over the whole period: what share of them falls in each band, and what share of the money. Each band opens in the list, filtered to exactly that band.

Contracting authorities

157 authorities (0.86% of them) spent over a billion lei each — together, 59% of all the money.

Open in the list: under 100k · 100k–1M · 1–10M · 10–100M · 100M–1bn · over 1bn

The largest authorities, by spending

Open the list

Suppliers

112 suppliers (0.05% of them) were paid over a billion lei each — together, 35% of all the money.

Open in the list: under 100k · 100k–1M · 1–10M · 10–100M · 100M–1bn · over 1bn

The largest suppliers, by revenue

The largest suppliers, by revenue
# Supplier Total, all years
1 SPEDITION UMB SRL 18,719,019,384
2 SA & PE CONSTRUCT SRL 17,590,698,529
3 TEHNOSTRADE SRL 16,349,945,202
4 ALSTOM TRANSPORT SA 14,295,028,539
5 RHEINMETALL AUTOMECANICA SRL 13,928,759,312
6 CONSTRUCTII ERBASU SA 13,895,392,261
7 PORR CONSTRUCT SRL 13,084,757,135
8 ORIENT SRL 10,240,235,065
9 ARCADA COMPANY SA 7,882,089,003
10 CONCELEX SRL 6,566,340,875

Open the list

Who buys

Spending by type of authority

The money of all years, by type of authority. The number of authorities, the average and the flagged share appear on hovering a bar.

Most money goes through State companies: 1,315 authorities, 37% of the total. Most authorities, though, are Schools: 6,512, with only 1.5% of the money.

The type is inferred from the name, with the same classifier as the statistics section; almost all money lands in a precise category, not in Other.

Links

How many partners each has

A relationship is an authority and a supplier between which money moved, in any stream. The charts show how many partners each has and how much a supplier depends on its main client.

Clients per supplier

42% of suppliers sold to a single authority, yet took only 4.4% of the money.

Suppliers per authority

An authority works with 136 suppliers on average.

Dependence on the main client

Of 41,897 suppliers with at least ten clients, 1,546 (3.7%) take 80% or more from a single one.

Dependence is measured only for suppliers with at least 10 clients: with one buyer, a company depends on it entirely and the figure says nothing. Indicator #04, supplier captivity

The largest relationships

the 500 largest relationships, by money

The largest relationships
Contracting authority Supplier Direct purchases Offline purchases Tenders Total Of the company's revenue Of the authority's spend Period
SPITALUL JUDETEAN DE URGENTA TARGOVISTECUI: 4206845 DRMAX SRL CUI: 9378655 220,136 — 248,886,340 249,106,476 18.8% 13.1% 2024–2026
COMPANIA NATIONALA DE CAI FERATE CFR SACUI: 11054529 TELECOMUNICATII CFR SA CUI: 15034095 — 60,000 248,644,439 248,704,439 96.1% 0.8% 2018–2026
SPITALUL CLINIC JUDETEAN DE URGENTACUI: 5002142 ELTA 90 MEDICAL RESEARCH SRL CUI: 27344880 307,860 10,175 247,748,454 248,066,489 47.1% 22.5% 2019–2024
COMPANIA NATIONALA DE INVESTITII CNI SACUI: 14273221 HIDRO SALT-B-92 SRL CUI: 8309185 —— 247,944,507 247,944,507 30.3% 0.9% 2019–2026
SNGN ROMGAZ SA-FILIALA DE INMAGAZINARE GAZE NATURALE DEPOGAZ PLOIESTI SRLCUI: 34915261 FORAJ SONDE SA CUI: 1397872 —— 246,644,990 246,644,990 95.6% 12.6% 2022–2024
UNITATEA MILITARA 02523CUI: 4183253 LEVIATAN DESIGN SRL CUI: 30329499 236,015 — 245,599,259 245,835,274 35.5% 3.9% 2019–2021
JUDETUL DOLJCUI: 4417150 DOMARCONS SRL CUI: 5470895 19,230 — 245,718,283 245,737,513 29.9% 14.8% 2019–2026
UNITATEA MILITARA 02547 BUCURESTICUI: 4192804 LEVIATAN DESIGN SRL CUI: 30329499 — 146,682 245,274,379 245,421,061 35.4% 14.4% 2023–2026
ENGIE ROMANIA SACUI: 13093222 INSTANT CONSTRUCT COMPANY SRL CUI: 14390680 —— 245,036,792 245,036,792 83.5% 11.6% 2020–2026
SOCIETATEA COMPLEXUL ENERGETIC OLTENIA SACUI: 30267310 ARTEGO SA CUI: 2157428 6,508 434,592 244,587,694 245,028,794 84.4% 7.2% 2018–2026
COMPANIA NATIONALA DE ADMINISTRARE A INFRASTRUCTURII RUTIERE SACUI: 16054368 SECOL SOCIETA EDILE COSTRUZIONI E LAVORI SA CUI: 33260287 —— 244,874,335 244,874,335 81.1% 0.3% 2020
SOCIETATEA NATIONALA DE GAZE NATURALE ROMGAZ SACUI: 14056826 WEATHERFORD ATLAS GIP SA CUI: 1360687 73,538 — 244,030,032 244,103,570 56.6% 5.7% 2018–2026
DIRECTIA GENERALA DE ADMINISTRARE A UNITATILOR DE INVATAMANT A SPORTULUI SI CULTURII SECTOR 4CUI: 38248861 PALEX CONSTRUCTII INSTALATII SRL CUI: 6546959 —— 242,594,812 242,594,812 12.4% 30.9% 2019–2023
AGENTIA NATIONALA DE CADASTRU SI PUBLICITATE IMOBILIARACUI: 9051601 TOTAL BUSINESS LAND SRL CUI: 34090016 —— 241,599,282 241,599,282 76.6% 22.4% 2020–2022
JUDETUL PRAHOVACUI: 2842889 ARTEHNIS SRL CUI: 18287343 250,000 84,720 240,524,010 240,858,730 65.1% 6.6% 2022–2024
COMPANIA NATIONALA DE TRANSPORT AL ENERGIEI ELECTRICE TRANSELECTRICA SACUI: 13328043 ELECTROMONTAJ CARPATI SA CUI: 790600 —— 239,922,445 239,922,445 81.3% 3.4% 2020–2025
MUNICIPIUL ARADCUI: 3519925 ELSACO ELECTRONIC SRL CUI: 7464520 —— 239,713,898 239,713,898 10.5% 10.4% 2020–2025
INSTITUTUL ONCOLOGIC PROFDRICHIRICUTA CLUJ-NAPOCACUI: 4547125 MEDIPLUS EXIM SRL CUI: 9311280 2,225 — 239,351,747 239,353,972 10.5% 19.3% 2018–2026
JUDETUL ARGESCUI: 4229512 CONI SRL CUI: 1310859 —— 239,243,642 239,243,642 13.3% 15.5% 2025
JUDETUL CONSTANTACUI: 2981739 OYL COMPANY HOLDING AG SRL CUI: 18741783 —— 238,409,557 238,409,557 17.0% 14.1% 2020–2025
INSTITUTUL REGIONAL DE ONCOLOGIE IASICUI: 29067408 ALLIANCE HEALTHCARE ROMANIA SRL CUI: 8955860 824,460 — 237,093,303 237,917,763 6.2% 27.3% 2018–2026
ASOCIATIA DE DEZVOLTARE INTERCOMUNITARA ECOLECT MURESCUI: 24219033 SYLEVY CLEANING SRL CUI: 42908966 —— 237,556,721 237,556,721 75.2% 35.1% 2022–2026
MUNICIPIUL GALATICUI: 3814810 LEMACONS SRL CUI: 26287387 — 24,888 236,086,405 236,111,293 26.2% 7.9% 2019–2025
JUDETUL CALARASICUI: 4294030 OYL COMPANY HOLDING AG SRL CUI: 18741783 —— 235,495,750 235,495,750 16.8% 19.5% 2025
JUDETUL TULCEACUI: 4321607 MAX BOEGL ROMANIA SRL CUI: 15943702 —— 235,070,208 235,070,208 69.7% 14.7% 2023–2026

301-325 of 500 results

Rows per page: 25 50 100

Each amount leads to the purchases it was computed from. For direct purchases and offline purchases the rows add up exactly to the figure; for tenders the notices the supplier won open, with the whole notice's value, not only its share.

Contracting authority
The authority that paid.
Supplier
The company that was paid. Indicator #04's symbol appears when the pair is a captivity case, and leads to it.
Direct purchases
Direct purchases between the two; the figure opens them.
Offline purchases
Offline purchases between the two; the figure opens them.
Tenders
The supplier's share of the authority's tender contracts; the figure opens the notices it won, at their full value.
Total
The three streams added up; the table is ordered by it by default.
Of the company's revenue
How much of the company's revenue comes from this authority. From 80% it reaches indicator #04's threshold.
Of the authority's spend
How much of the authority's spending went to this company.
Period
The first and last year money moved between the two.

Where they are

Money between counties

Authorities and suppliers by registered seat. Nationally, 42% of the money goes to suppliers in the same county as the authority paying.

Money between counties
County Spent by authorities Paid to suppliers Balance Kept in county
BUCUREȘTI 402,774,581,342 340,698,732,839 −62,075,848,503 50.3%
CLUJ 42,949,332,013 39,907,897,477 −3,041,434,536 28.7%
CONSTANȚA 29,971,401,003 19,736,689,281 −10,234,711,722 38.4%
PRAHOVA 27,122,941,960 21,827,406,721 −5,295,535,239 21.7%
ILFOV 26,932,907,256 45,509,761,947 +18,576,854,691 11.7%
IAȘI 25,715,520,872 30,161,901,088 +4,446,380,216 42.9%
SIBIU 22,917,346,144 39,178,703,255 +16,261,357,111 30.8%
DOLJ 22,619,657,602 17,228,954,392 −5,390,703,210 28.3%
TIMIȘ 22,326,446,958 22,867,879,218 +541,432,260 46.4%
BRAȘOV 20,047,550,734 23,021,454,340 +2,973,903,606 40.2%
BIHOR 19,601,643,054 20,740,206,617 +1,138,563,563 53.5%
MUREȘ 19,290,197,944 16,013,813,397 −3,276,384,547 35.1%
GALAȚI 17,528,009,138 28,545,197,443 +11,017,188,305 47.5%
SUCEAVA 16,555,747,029 15,940,734,645 −615,012,384 54.5%
BACĂU 15,431,849,067 66,626,729,575 +51,194,880,508 38.9%
HUNEDOARA 12,674,505,151 9,406,048,168 −3,268,456,983 45.3%
DÂMBOVIȚA 12,494,422,242 10,214,114,846 −2,280,307,396 27.6%
ARGEȘ 12,277,108,444 16,324,045,259 +4,046,936,815 48.5%
MARAMUREȘ 12,248,110,895 11,850,780,398 −397,330,497 42.9%
GORJ 12,024,206,616 6,132,498,500 −5,891,708,116 30.0%
ARAD 11,681,104,046 11,510,823,321 −170,280,725 48.1%
VÂLCEA 10,893,639,910 7,694,825,586 −3,198,814,324 31.8%
NEAMȚ 10,686,581,493 9,440,405,039 −1,246,176,454 38.4%
BUZĂU 10,292,445,454 20,605,729,865 +10,313,284,411 36.5%
OLT 10,154,687,706 11,331,404,190 +1,176,716,484 39.5%
ALBA 9,823,438,572 8,540,756,433 −1,282,682,139 49.0%
BISTRIȚA-NĂSĂUD 9,369,280,015 17,358,724,571 +7,989,444,556 55.9%
VRANCEA 9,155,330,404 4,007,668,377 −5,147,662,027 28.1%
SATU MARE 8,886,188,326 10,931,166,734 +2,044,978,408 37.5%
BOTOȘANI 8,809,291,749 15,557,225,293 +6,747,933,544 47.3%
VASLUI 8,683,401,647 6,096,072,302 −2,587,329,345 40.1%
HARGHITA 8,171,038,385 7,321,112,389 −849,925,996 57.4%
CARAȘ-SEVERIN 7,595,498,491 3,151,688,083 −4,443,810,408 26.1%
BRĂILA 7,516,549,893 5,303,965,853 −2,212,584,040 34.0%
TULCEA 7,279,698,710 4,866,466,475 −2,413,232,235 27.6%
CĂLĂRAȘI 6,768,441,994 4,288,688,751 −2,479,753,243 28.9%
MEHEDINȚI 6,341,112,523 4,863,367,424 −1,477,745,099 47.4%
TELEORMAN 6,164,463,561 3,910,833,905 −2,253,629,656 31.6%
GIURGIU 5,946,842,921 3,035,617,748 −2,911,225,173 16.9%
IALOMIȚA 5,916,514,854 4,042,859,532 −1,873,655,322 28.0%
SĂLAJ 5,559,311,281 5,313,741,007 −245,570,274 41.2%
COVASNA 4,912,076,832 3,003,731,947 −1,908,344,885 43.1%
County
The county of the seat; links to its statistics page.
Spent by authorities
Everything the authorities seated in the county paid to named suppliers, wherever those are.
Paid to suppliers
Everything the companies seated in the county were paid, by authorities anywhere.
Balance
Paid minus spent: positive where the county's companies received more than its authorities paid out. The sign is not a judgement: large companies' seats pull money towards their county.
Kept in county
How much of the county's authority spending went to suppliers in the same county; this is the map's colour.

Over time

How many are active each year

The authorities that spent and the suppliers that were paid each year, and the suppliers paid for the first time.

* A year the data does not cover in full: the first starts in April 2018, the last is not over. In the first year every supplier is new, so it has no newcomer bar.

Flags

Who is flagged, by size

The share of each size band flagged by at least one indicator and by three or more, as the indicator dashboard counts them.

Contracting authorities

Suppliers

A large entity makes more purchases and clears the minimum floors of more indicators, so a rising curve is partly volume, not only conduct. Indicator dashboard

The same data, through the API

Every figure on this page comes from the public API, through the endpoints below. The parameters each one takes are in the documentation; each needs an access key.

  • /api/v1/entities
  • /api/v1/red-flags/coverage
  • /api/v1/entities/bands
  • /api/v1/stats/top/authorities
  • /api/v1/stats/top/suppliers
  • /api/v1/entities/authority-types
  • /api/v1/stats/periods
  • /api/v1/entities/years
  • /api/v1/entities/counties
  • /api/v1/entities/relationships

Open data and API