Skip to content

Authorities and suppliers

Who buys, who sells, and how they are linked.

Size

A few hold most of the money

Entities split by their money over the whole period: what share of them falls in each band, and what share of the money. Each band opens in the list, filtered to exactly that band.

Contracting authorities

157 authorities (0.86% of them) spent over a billion lei each — together, 59% of all the money.

Open in the list: under 100k · 100k–1M · 1–10M · 10–100M · 100M–1bn · over 1bn

The largest authorities, by spending

Open the list

Suppliers

112 suppliers (0.05% of them) were paid over a billion lei each — together, 35% of all the money.

Open in the list: under 100k · 100k–1M · 1–10M · 10–100M · 100M–1bn · over 1bn

The largest suppliers, by revenue

The largest suppliers, by revenue
# Supplier Total, all years
1 SPEDITION UMB SRL 18,719,019,384
2 SA & PE CONSTRUCT SRL 17,590,698,529
3 TEHNOSTRADE SRL 16,349,945,202
4 ALSTOM TRANSPORT SA 14,295,028,539
5 RHEINMETALL AUTOMECANICA SRL 13,928,759,312
6 CONSTRUCTII ERBASU SA 13,895,392,261
7 PORR CONSTRUCT SRL 13,084,757,135
8 ORIENT SRL 10,240,235,065
9 ARCADA COMPANY SA 7,882,089,003
10 CONCELEX SRL 6,566,340,875

Open the list

Who buys

Spending by type of authority

The money of all years, by type of authority. The number of authorities, the average and the flagged share appear on hovering a bar.

Most money goes through State companies: 1,315 authorities, 37% of the total. Most authorities, though, are Schools: 6,512, with only 1.5% of the money.

The type is inferred from the name, with the same classifier as the statistics section; almost all money lands in a precise category, not in Other.

Links

How many partners each has

A relationship is an authority and a supplier between which money moved, in any stream. The charts show how many partners each has and how much a supplier depends on its main client.

Clients per supplier

42% of suppliers sold to a single authority, yet took only 4.4% of the money.

Suppliers per authority

An authority works with 136 suppliers on average.

Dependence on the main client

Of 41,897 suppliers with at least ten clients, 1,546 (3.7%) take 80% or more from a single one.

Dependence is measured only for suppliers with at least 10 clients: with one buyer, a company depends on it entirely and the figure says nothing. Indicator #04, supplier captivity

The largest relationships

the 500 largest relationships, by money

The largest relationships
Contracting authority Supplier Direct purchases Offline purchases Tenders Total Of the company's revenue Of the authority's spend Period
RAJA SACUI: 1890420 TINMAR ENERGY SA CUI: 34620961 —— 234,930,003 234,930,003 5.1% 5.2% 2019–2024
SOCIETATEA NATIONALA DE GAZE NATURALE ROMGAZ SACUI: 14056826 PROSPECTIUNI SA CUI: 1552801 —— 234,905,363 234,905,363 87.7% 5.4% 2018–2026
DELGAZ GRID SACUI: 10976687 EPLUS SMART ENERGY SRL CUI: 29802703 —— 233,329,875 233,329,875 78.3% 4.3% 2020–2023
SERVICIUL DE TELECOMUNICATII SPECIALECUI: 4267230 TRENCADIS CORP SRL CUI: 20415754 144,380 88,000 232,557,633 232,790,013 40.4% 6.1% 2018–2025
INSTITUTUL NATIONAL DE CERCETARE - DEZVOLTARE PENTRU FIZICA SI INGINERIE NUCLEARA HORIA HULUBEI - IFIN - HHCUI: 3321234 COMPIL PIPERA SA Indicator #04 flags the pair — see the case CUI: 94 —— 232,666,700 232,666,700 99.9% 30.9% 2019
DIRECTIA GENERALA PENTRU ADMINISTRAREA PATRIMONIULUI IMOBILIAR SECTOR 2CUI: 14783794 PALEX CONSTRUCTII INSTALATII SRL CUI: 6546959 —— 232,121,999 232,121,999 11.9% 11.2% 2019–2022
COMPANIA NATIONALA DE CAI FERATE CFR SA BUCURESTI SUCURSALA REGIONALA DE CAI FERATE BUCURESTICUI: 15548207 OMEGA CERT SISTEM SRL CUI: 21340331 —— 231,819,571 231,819,571 99.9% 26.4% 2023–2026
JUDETUL BISTRITA-NASAUDCUI: 4347550 TRANSMIXT SA CUI: 570362 — 40,500 230,774,117 230,814,617 70.6% 13.0% 2023–2026
MUNICIPIUL BISTRITACUI: 4347569 MIS-GRUP SRL CUI: 12472562 445,652 — 230,171,629 230,617,281 17.3% 22.1% 2019–2026
ASOCIATIA DE DEZVOLTARE INTERCOMUNITARA OLT-ECOCUI: 25504895 SALUBRIS SA CUI: 6516214 —— 230,148,068 230,148,068 55.2% 99.9% 2021
ASOCIATIA INTERCOMUNITARA DE DEZVOLTARE ALBA IULIA - TRANSPORT LOCALCUI: 25888974 SOCIETATEA DE TRANSPORT PUBLIC SA ALBA IULIA Indicator #04 flags the pair — see the case CUI: 1758080 —— 229,598,145 229,598,145 99.7% 100.0% 2021
JUDETUL TIMISCUI: 4358029 STRABAG SRL CUI: 6891914 —— 228,242,261 228,242,261 3.8% 13.3% 2020–2026
RAJA SACUI: 1890420 GEOMARCO CONSTRUCT SRL CUI: 18802783 — 1,764,097 226,464,392 228,228,489 89.7% 5.0% 2018–2026
COMPANIA NATIONALA DE ADMINISTRARE A INFRASTRUCTURII RUTIERE SACUI: 16054368 VODAFONE ROMANIA SA CUI: 8971726 518,611 1,277,625 226,071,866 227,868,102 5.6% 0.3% 2018–2026
SOCIETATEA DE PRODUCERE A ENERGIEI ELECTRICE IN HIDROCENTRALE HIDROELECTRICA SACUI: 13267213 ENEVO GROUP SRL CUI: 33110123 — 77,750 227,603,464 227,681,214 57.7% 5.1% 2020–2026
ASOCIATIA DE DEZVOLTARE INTERCOMUNITARA DE UTILITATI PUBLICE PENTRU SERVICIUL DE SALUBRIZARE PARTENERIATULUI PENTRU MANAGEMENTUL DESEURILOR PRAHOVACUI: 26119626 BIN GO SOLUTIONS SRL CUI: 6089555 —— 227,221,485 227,221,485 17.1% 64.5% 2018–2025
INSPECTORATUL GENERAL DE AVIATIE AL MINISTERULUI INTERNELOR SI REFORMEI ADMINISTRATIVECUI: 24367374 SIMULTEC SRL CUI: 406093 —— 226,625,912 226,625,912 78.7% 27.9% 2026
MUNICIPIUL BUCURESTICUI: 4267117 UNICREDIT BANK SA CUI: 361536 —— 226,382,964 226,382,964 74.5% 3.0% 2021–2024
DISTRIBUTIE ENERGIE OLTENIA SACUI: 14491102 ENERGOBIT SA CUI: 211717 —— 226,166,621 226,166,621 26.9% 6.5% 2019–2026
JUDETUL GALATICUI: 3127476 ADD GLOBAL DESIGN SRL CUI: 31593331 344,100 — 225,665,178 226,009,278 73.8% 6.2% 2018–2026
INSTITUTUL NATIONAL DE BOLI INFECTIOASE PROFDRMATEI BALSCUI: 9524980 ROMASTRU TRADING SRL CUI: 6769462 121,043 — 224,852,464 224,973,507 58.3% 18.2% 2018–2026
COMPANIA NATIONALA ADMINISTRATIA CANALELOR NAVIGABILE SACUI: 11087755 UTILNAVOREP SA CUI: 1905300 — 958,553 223,617,896 224,576,449 56.0% 18.1% 2019–2024
JUDETUL VALCEACUI: 2540929 STRABAG SRL CUI: 6891914 —— 223,960,097 223,960,097 3.7% 9.7% 2019–2026
COMPANIA NATIONALA DE INVESTITII CNI SACUI: 14273221 COLEN IMPEX SRL CUI: 14388299 —— 223,412,799 223,412,799 36.7% 0.8% 2018–2025
MUNICIPIUL CRAIOVACUI: 4417214 DRUM CONCEPT SRL CUI: 25872722 — 380,822 222,409,499 222,790,321 17.6% 8.4% 2019–2026

326-350 of 500 results

Rows per page: 25 50 100

Each amount leads to the purchases it was computed from. For direct purchases and offline purchases the rows add up exactly to the figure; for tenders the notices the supplier won open, with the whole notice's value, not only its share.

Contracting authority
The authority that paid.
Supplier
The company that was paid. Indicator #04's symbol appears when the pair is a captivity case, and leads to it.
Direct purchases
Direct purchases between the two; the figure opens them.
Offline purchases
Offline purchases between the two; the figure opens them.
Tenders
The supplier's share of the authority's tender contracts; the figure opens the notices it won, at their full value.
Total
The three streams added up; the table is ordered by it by default.
Of the company's revenue
How much of the company's revenue comes from this authority. From 80% it reaches indicator #04's threshold.
Of the authority's spend
How much of the authority's spending went to this company.
Period
The first and last year money moved between the two.

Where they are

Money between counties

Authorities and suppliers by registered seat. Nationally, 42% of the money goes to suppliers in the same county as the authority paying.

Money between counties
County Spent by authorities Paid to suppliers Balance Kept in county
BUCUREȘTI 402,774,581,342 340,698,732,839 −62,075,848,503 50.3%
CLUJ 42,949,332,013 39,907,897,477 −3,041,434,536 28.7%
CONSTANȚA 29,971,401,003 19,736,689,281 −10,234,711,722 38.4%
PRAHOVA 27,122,941,960 21,827,406,721 −5,295,535,239 21.7%
ILFOV 26,932,907,256 45,509,761,947 +18,576,854,691 11.7%
IAȘI 25,715,520,872 30,161,901,088 +4,446,380,216 42.9%
SIBIU 22,917,346,144 39,178,703,255 +16,261,357,111 30.8%
DOLJ 22,619,657,602 17,228,954,392 −5,390,703,210 28.3%
TIMIȘ 22,326,446,958 22,867,879,218 +541,432,260 46.4%
BRAȘOV 20,047,550,734 23,021,454,340 +2,973,903,606 40.2%
BIHOR 19,601,643,054 20,740,206,617 +1,138,563,563 53.5%
MUREȘ 19,290,197,944 16,013,813,397 −3,276,384,547 35.1%
GALAȚI 17,528,009,138 28,545,197,443 +11,017,188,305 47.5%
SUCEAVA 16,555,747,029 15,940,734,645 −615,012,384 54.5%
BACĂU 15,431,849,067 66,626,729,575 +51,194,880,508 38.9%
HUNEDOARA 12,674,505,151 9,406,048,168 −3,268,456,983 45.3%
DÂMBOVIȚA 12,494,422,242 10,214,114,846 −2,280,307,396 27.6%
ARGEȘ 12,277,108,444 16,324,045,259 +4,046,936,815 48.5%
MARAMUREȘ 12,248,110,895 11,850,780,398 −397,330,497 42.9%
GORJ 12,024,206,616 6,132,498,500 −5,891,708,116 30.0%
ARAD 11,681,104,046 11,510,823,321 −170,280,725 48.1%
VÂLCEA 10,893,639,910 7,694,825,586 −3,198,814,324 31.8%
NEAMȚ 10,686,581,493 9,440,405,039 −1,246,176,454 38.4%
BUZĂU 10,292,445,454 20,605,729,865 +10,313,284,411 36.5%
OLT 10,154,687,706 11,331,404,190 +1,176,716,484 39.5%
ALBA 9,823,438,572 8,540,756,433 −1,282,682,139 49.0%
BISTRIȚA-NĂSĂUD 9,369,280,015 17,358,724,571 +7,989,444,556 55.9%
VRANCEA 9,155,330,404 4,007,668,377 −5,147,662,027 28.1%
SATU MARE 8,886,188,326 10,931,166,734 +2,044,978,408 37.5%
BOTOȘANI 8,809,291,749 15,557,225,293 +6,747,933,544 47.3%
VASLUI 8,683,401,647 6,096,072,302 −2,587,329,345 40.1%
HARGHITA 8,171,038,385 7,321,112,389 −849,925,996 57.4%
CARAȘ-SEVERIN 7,595,498,491 3,151,688,083 −4,443,810,408 26.1%
BRĂILA 7,516,549,893 5,303,965,853 −2,212,584,040 34.0%
TULCEA 7,279,698,710 4,866,466,475 −2,413,232,235 27.6%
CĂLĂRAȘI 6,768,441,994 4,288,688,751 −2,479,753,243 28.9%
MEHEDINȚI 6,341,112,523 4,863,367,424 −1,477,745,099 47.4%
TELEORMAN 6,164,463,561 3,910,833,905 −2,253,629,656 31.6%
GIURGIU 5,946,842,921 3,035,617,748 −2,911,225,173 16.9%
IALOMIȚA 5,916,514,854 4,042,859,532 −1,873,655,322 28.0%
SĂLAJ 5,559,311,281 5,313,741,007 −245,570,274 41.2%
COVASNA 4,912,076,832 3,003,731,947 −1,908,344,885 43.1%
County
The county of the seat; links to its statistics page.
Spent by authorities
Everything the authorities seated in the county paid to named suppliers, wherever those are.
Paid to suppliers
Everything the companies seated in the county were paid, by authorities anywhere.
Balance
Paid minus spent: positive where the county's companies received more than its authorities paid out. The sign is not a judgement: large companies' seats pull money towards their county.
Kept in county
How much of the county's authority spending went to suppliers in the same county; this is the map's colour.

Over time

How many are active each year

The authorities that spent and the suppliers that were paid each year, and the suppliers paid for the first time.

* A year the data does not cover in full: the first starts in April 2018, the last is not over. In the first year every supplier is new, so it has no newcomer bar.

Flags

Who is flagged, by size

The share of each size band flagged by at least one indicator and by three or more, as the indicator dashboard counts them.

Contracting authorities

Suppliers

A large entity makes more purchases and clears the minimum floors of more indicators, so a rising curve is partly volume, not only conduct. Indicator dashboard

The same data, through the API

Every figure on this page comes from the public API, through the endpoints below. The parameters each one takes are in the documentation; each needs an access key.

  • /api/v1/entities
  • /api/v1/red-flags/coverage
  • /api/v1/entities/bands
  • /api/v1/stats/top/authorities
  • /api/v1/stats/top/suppliers
  • /api/v1/entities/authority-types
  • /api/v1/stats/periods
  • /api/v1/entities/years
  • /api/v1/entities/counties
  • /api/v1/entities/relationships

Open data and API