Skip to content

Authorities and suppliers

Who buys, who sells, and how they are linked.

Size

A few hold most of the money

Entities split by their money over the whole period: what share of them falls in each band, and what share of the money. Each band opens in the list, filtered to exactly that band.

Contracting authorities

157 authorities (0.86% of them) spent over a billion lei each — together, 59% of all the money.

Open in the list: under 100k · 100k–1M · 1–10M · 10–100M · 100M–1bn · over 1bn

The largest authorities, by spending

Open the list

Suppliers

112 suppliers (0.05% of them) were paid over a billion lei each — together, 35% of all the money.

Open in the list: under 100k · 100k–1M · 1–10M · 10–100M · 100M–1bn · over 1bn

The largest suppliers, by revenue

The largest suppliers, by revenue
# Supplier Total, all years
1 SPEDITION UMB SRL 18,719,019,384
2 SA & PE CONSTRUCT SRL 17,590,698,529
3 TEHNOSTRADE SRL 16,349,945,202
4 ALSTOM TRANSPORT SA 14,295,028,539
5 RHEINMETALL AUTOMECANICA SRL 13,928,759,312
6 CONSTRUCTII ERBASU SA 13,895,392,261
7 PORR CONSTRUCT SRL 13,084,757,135
8 ORIENT SRL 10,240,235,065
9 ARCADA COMPANY SA 7,882,089,003
10 CONCELEX SRL 6,566,340,875

Open the list

Who buys

Spending by type of authority

The money of all years, by type of authority. The number of authorities, the average and the flagged share appear on hovering a bar.

Most money goes through State companies: 1,315 authorities, 37% of the total. Most authorities, though, are Schools: 6,512, with only 1.5% of the money.

The type is inferred from the name, with the same classifier as the statistics section; almost all money lands in a precise category, not in Other.

Links

How many partners each has

A relationship is an authority and a supplier between which money moved, in any stream. The charts show how many partners each has and how much a supplier depends on its main client.

Clients per supplier

42% of suppliers sold to a single authority, yet took only 4.4% of the money.

Suppliers per authority

An authority works with 136 suppliers on average.

Dependence on the main client

Of 41,897 suppliers with at least ten clients, 1,546 (3.7%) take 80% or more from a single one.

Dependence is measured only for suppliers with at least 10 clients: with one buyer, a company depends on it entirely and the figure says nothing. Indicator #04, supplier captivity

The largest relationships

the 500 largest relationships, by money

The largest relationships
Contracting authority Supplier Direct purchases Offline purchases Tenders Total Of the company's revenue Of the authority's spend Period
SECTORUL 4 AL MUNICIPIULUI BUCURESTICUI: 4316422 SOMET SA CUI: 3168980 —— 222,759,044 222,759,044 16.6% 1.0% 2020–2025
COMPANIA DE APA OLTENIA SACUI: 11400673 ELSACO ELECTRONIC SRL CUI: 7464520 —— 222,676,915 222,676,915 9.7% 9.8% 2020
COMPANIA REGIONALA DE APA BACAU SACUI: 27429315 OCSA CONSTRUCTII SI INFRASTRUCTURA SRL CUI: 27260762 —— 222,043,122 222,043,122 22.7% 8.3% 2022–2025
JUDETUL BACAUCUI: 5057580 CONEXTRUST SA CUI: 947730 59,700 — 221,304,667 221,364,367 20.5% 10.7% 2019–2025
APAVITAL SACUI: 1959768 CONEST SA CUI: 1959695 2,693,238 4,709 218,420,132 221,118,079 15.6% 6.0% 2018–2026
UNITATEA MILITARA 0276CUI: 4203997 DATASEC CONSULTING SRL CUI: 17819795 — 20,000 220,211,835 220,231,835 85.7% 5.8% 2021–2024
COMPANIA NATIONALA DE CAI FERATE CFR SA BUCURESTI SUCURSALA REGIONALA DE CAI FERATE BRASOVCUI: 15509275 DRUM ASFALT SRL CUI: 22519077 —— 219,135,621 219,135,621 15.1% 21.8% 2022–2025
COMPANIA NATIONALA DE INVESTITII CNI SACUI: 14273221 CONCRETE & DESIGN SOLUTIONS SRL CUI: 31730943 1,059,209 67,800 217,695,765 218,822,774 18.0% 0.8% 2018–2025
UNITATEA MILITARA 02523CUI: 4183253 ERP MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCT AG SRL CUI: 42109748 —— 218,424,980 218,424,980 99.8% 3.5% 2020–2023
METROREX SACUI: 13863739 GETICA 95 COM SRL CUI: 7562758 —— 218,192,386 218,192,386 6.4% 2.9% 2020–2022
JUDETUL PRAHOVACUI: 2842889 SOLID WASTE OPERATION SRL CUI: 39587181 —— 217,511,140 217,511,140 89.2% 5.9% 2019
COMPANIA NATIONALA DE TRANSPORT AL ENERGIEI ELECTRICE TRANSELECTRICA SACUI: 13328043 ELECTROGRUP SA CUI: 9256208 —— 217,381,392 217,381,392 23.7% 3.0% 2021–2022
RAJA SACUI: 1890420 OCSA CONSTRUCTII SI INFRASTRUCTURA SRL CUI: 27260762 —— 216,783,501 216,783,501 22.2% 4.8% 2020–2021
COMPANIA NATIONALA AEROPORTURI BUCURESTI SACUI: 26490194 X GUARD SECURITY SYSTEM SRL CUI: 36559101 —— 216,680,744 216,680,744 73.7% 3.7% 2021–2026
SOCIETATEA NATIONALA DE TRANSPORT GAZE NATURALE TRANSGAZ SACUI: 13068733 I R I G C INTREPRINDEREA DE REPARATII SI INSTALATII GAZE SI CONSTRUCTII IMPEX SRL CUI: 5039729 —— 216,545,337 216,545,337 32.3% 4.2% 2018–2026
MUNICIPIUL ORADEACUI: 4230487 DRUM ASFALT SRL CUI: 22519077 900,354 — 214,917,987 215,818,341 14.9% 4.6% 2018–2026
UNITATEA MILITARA NR 02444 SIBIUCUI: 4240847 CON-A OPERATIONS SRL CUI: 15036274 —— 215,575,259 215,575,259 14.0% 18.8% 2024–2026
COMPANIA DE APA OLTENIA SACUI: 11400673 CONSTRUCTII ERBASU SA CUI: 430008 —— 215,542,126 215,542,126 1.6% 9.5% 2021
MUNICIPIUL BUCURESTICUI: 4267117 BANCA COMERCIALA ROMANA SA CUI: 361757 33,560 25,000 215,385,252 215,443,812 32.5% 2.9% 2018–2026
JUDETUL ARADCUI: 3519941 INTECO HOLDING SRL CUI: 14989507 —— 215,093,354 215,093,354 40.9% 12.2% 2019–2026
COMUNA VOICESTICUI: 2573993 HAGAG DISTRIBUTIE SI FURNIZARE SRL Indicator #04 flags the pair — see the case CUI: 52372058 —— 215,006,445 215,006,445 94.9% 92.1% 2026
MINISTERUL AFACERILOR INTERNECUI: 4267095 NOVA POWER & GAS SA CUI: 18680651 —— 214,342,362 214,342,362 13.7% 8.6% 2024–2026
CONSILIUL JUDETEAN IASI - DIRECTIA JUDETEANA DE ADMINISTRARE A DRUMURILOR SI PODURILOR IASICUI: 14009336 DANLIN XXL SRL CUI: 16360111 —— 214,023,278 214,023,278 10.3% 27.4% 2019–2024
JUDETUL CLUJCUI: 4288110 SUPERCOM SA CUI: 3884955 —— 213,797,916 213,797,916 10.8% 6.7% 2022
MUNICIPIUL TIMISOARACUI: 14756536 SYLC CON TRANS SRL CUI: 16356935 —— 210,686,645 210,686,645 26.6% 7.4% 2020–2026

351-375 of 500 results

Rows per page: 25 50 100

Each amount leads to the purchases it was computed from. For direct purchases and offline purchases the rows add up exactly to the figure; for tenders the notices the supplier won open, with the whole notice's value, not only its share.

Contracting authority
The authority that paid.
Supplier
The company that was paid. Indicator #04's symbol appears when the pair is a captivity case, and leads to it.
Direct purchases
Direct purchases between the two; the figure opens them.
Offline purchases
Offline purchases between the two; the figure opens them.
Tenders
The supplier's share of the authority's tender contracts; the figure opens the notices it won, at their full value.
Total
The three streams added up; the table is ordered by it by default.
Of the company's revenue
How much of the company's revenue comes from this authority. From 80% it reaches indicator #04's threshold.
Of the authority's spend
How much of the authority's spending went to this company.
Period
The first and last year money moved between the two.

Where they are

Money between counties

Authorities and suppliers by registered seat. Nationally, 42% of the money goes to suppliers in the same county as the authority paying.

Money between counties
County Spent by authorities Paid to suppliers Balance Kept in county
BUCUREȘTI 402,774,581,342 340,698,732,839 −62,075,848,503 50.3%
CLUJ 42,949,332,013 39,907,897,477 −3,041,434,536 28.7%
CONSTANȚA 29,971,401,003 19,736,689,281 −10,234,711,722 38.4%
PRAHOVA 27,122,941,960 21,827,406,721 −5,295,535,239 21.7%
ILFOV 26,932,907,256 45,509,761,947 +18,576,854,691 11.7%
IAȘI 25,715,520,872 30,161,901,088 +4,446,380,216 42.9%
SIBIU 22,917,346,144 39,178,703,255 +16,261,357,111 30.8%
DOLJ 22,619,657,602 17,228,954,392 −5,390,703,210 28.3%
TIMIȘ 22,326,446,958 22,867,879,218 +541,432,260 46.4%
BRAȘOV 20,047,550,734 23,021,454,340 +2,973,903,606 40.2%
BIHOR 19,601,643,054 20,740,206,617 +1,138,563,563 53.5%
MUREȘ 19,290,197,944 16,013,813,397 −3,276,384,547 35.1%
GALAȚI 17,528,009,138 28,545,197,443 +11,017,188,305 47.5%
SUCEAVA 16,555,747,029 15,940,734,645 −615,012,384 54.5%
BACĂU 15,431,849,067 66,626,729,575 +51,194,880,508 38.9%
HUNEDOARA 12,674,505,151 9,406,048,168 −3,268,456,983 45.3%
DÂMBOVIȚA 12,494,422,242 10,214,114,846 −2,280,307,396 27.6%
ARGEȘ 12,277,108,444 16,324,045,259 +4,046,936,815 48.5%
MARAMUREȘ 12,248,110,895 11,850,780,398 −397,330,497 42.9%
GORJ 12,024,206,616 6,132,498,500 −5,891,708,116 30.0%
ARAD 11,681,104,046 11,510,823,321 −170,280,725 48.1%
VÂLCEA 10,893,639,910 7,694,825,586 −3,198,814,324 31.8%
NEAMȚ 10,686,581,493 9,440,405,039 −1,246,176,454 38.4%
BUZĂU 10,292,445,454 20,605,729,865 +10,313,284,411 36.5%
OLT 10,154,687,706 11,331,404,190 +1,176,716,484 39.5%
ALBA 9,823,438,572 8,540,756,433 −1,282,682,139 49.0%
BISTRIȚA-NĂSĂUD 9,369,280,015 17,358,724,571 +7,989,444,556 55.9%
VRANCEA 9,155,330,404 4,007,668,377 −5,147,662,027 28.1%
SATU MARE 8,886,188,326 10,931,166,734 +2,044,978,408 37.5%
BOTOȘANI 8,809,291,749 15,557,225,293 +6,747,933,544 47.3%
VASLUI 8,683,401,647 6,096,072,302 −2,587,329,345 40.1%
HARGHITA 8,171,038,385 7,321,112,389 −849,925,996 57.4%
CARAȘ-SEVERIN 7,595,498,491 3,151,688,083 −4,443,810,408 26.1%
BRĂILA 7,516,549,893 5,303,965,853 −2,212,584,040 34.0%
TULCEA 7,279,698,710 4,866,466,475 −2,413,232,235 27.6%
CĂLĂRAȘI 6,768,441,994 4,288,688,751 −2,479,753,243 28.9%
MEHEDINȚI 6,341,112,523 4,863,367,424 −1,477,745,099 47.4%
TELEORMAN 6,164,463,561 3,910,833,905 −2,253,629,656 31.6%
GIURGIU 5,946,842,921 3,035,617,748 −2,911,225,173 16.9%
IALOMIȚA 5,916,514,854 4,042,859,532 −1,873,655,322 28.0%
SĂLAJ 5,559,311,281 5,313,741,007 −245,570,274 41.2%
COVASNA 4,912,076,832 3,003,731,947 −1,908,344,885 43.1%
County
The county of the seat; links to its statistics page.
Spent by authorities
Everything the authorities seated in the county paid to named suppliers, wherever those are.
Paid to suppliers
Everything the companies seated in the county were paid, by authorities anywhere.
Balance
Paid minus spent: positive where the county's companies received more than its authorities paid out. The sign is not a judgement: large companies' seats pull money towards their county.
Kept in county
How much of the county's authority spending went to suppliers in the same county; this is the map's colour.

Over time

How many are active each year

The authorities that spent and the suppliers that were paid each year, and the suppliers paid for the first time.

* A year the data does not cover in full: the first starts in April 2018, the last is not over. In the first year every supplier is new, so it has no newcomer bar.

Flags

Who is flagged, by size

The share of each size band flagged by at least one indicator and by three or more, as the indicator dashboard counts them.

Contracting authorities

Suppliers

A large entity makes more purchases and clears the minimum floors of more indicators, so a rising curve is partly volume, not only conduct. Indicator dashboard

The same data, through the API

Every figure on this page comes from the public API, through the endpoints below. The parameters each one takes are in the documentation; each needs an access key.

  • /api/v1/entities
  • /api/v1/red-flags/coverage
  • /api/v1/entities/bands
  • /api/v1/stats/top/authorities
  • /api/v1/stats/top/suppliers
  • /api/v1/entities/authority-types
  • /api/v1/stats/periods
  • /api/v1/entities/years
  • /api/v1/entities/counties
  • /api/v1/entities/relationships

Open data and API